It is becoming clear what the Coalition Government has planned for the country. On the surface of it the government has found a situation far worse than they had imagined and is having to take emergency action. Deep down the Conservative Party is delighted beyond its wildest dreams.
The public has an expectation of spending cuts and the Conservatives have the Liberal Democrats signed up for a five year government. The Labour Party is listless and rudderless, following losing the May election, totally unable to oppose the Con-Lib Government. Even worse is the lack of vision of the candidates in the Labour Party’s leadership election. This then has given the Conservative Party its opportunity to go way beyond what Margaret Thatcher did in the 1980s.
This is about ideology. The people that have for years paid into the Conservative Party will now see a return on their investment. The factors I have already mentioned will reap them a rich harvest.
Michael Gove the softy spoken Education Minister had difficulty in getting his facts and figures right this week on what was being axed in the school building programme. To Mr. Gove’s inconvenience the Speaker of the House of Commons called him to Parliament to explain himself and apologise. This was done with fulsome apologies, offers to meet those aggrieved but no embarrassment shown by Mr. Gove. The school building cuts will still be made. Sure some Tory MPs will lose their new school and the opportunity to have a nice picture taken with the local press while they praise the Con-Lib Government.
To make my point clear its worth looking back over the years at what Michael Gove has said and written about on many issues. Mr. Gove isn’t making these cuts because he has to; he is making these cuts because he wants to. Like so many in the Conservative Party he wants to roll back the role of the state (which affects me and you!) and use the power of money to decide who has what in this world.
Peterborough is not immune too: This week Stewart Jackson (“community based MP”) is quoted in the Peterborough Evening Telegraph (10.7.2010) as saying, “We have too much social housing” and in Mr. Jackson’s “Westminster Life” Column (9.7.2010) he states, “So despite the area being a centre of crime and anti-social behaviour and multiple deprivation anyway, they thought it was a great idea to import even more benefit dependent workless individuals!”
A Bus driver in Peterborough on basic pay earns £8.50 per hour which is £17k per year. That would get them a mortgage of £59, 500. Assuming a property price of £90,000 which really is cheap in Peterborough that leaves the deposit of £39, 500 to find. Jobs in call centres and warehousing/distribution seem to have a salary of about £13.5k basic. You don’t have to be in Mr Jackson’s, “benefit dependent workless individuals” to need good quality reasonably priced housing.
Maybe the Tory answer to social housing is more slum landlords and we seem to have more than our fair share of those in Peterborough. Get rid of “red tape”, the inconvenient legislation that inhibits the private rental sector, put council enforcement officials under even more pressure by cuts in budgets and the rewards for entrepreneurs could be, well, quite rewarding.
It may well be that Stewart Jackson (“community based MP”) has been working very hard in his new Government role helping the peace process in Northern Ireland and he wrote and quoted while not at his best. We all make mistakes as Mr Gove proved earlier.
Having been on the same platform with Mr Jackson (“community based”....you get the picture!) during the 2010 election I don’t think it was any mistake. I believe we have an MP one of those Tory’s who delights in the opportunity they have to reward the Conservative Party donors for all their millions. Mr Jackson used to work for a bank too!
So that leaves us with problems. Some may call them issues, on the basis you have to deal with problems and issues just have to be recognised. Others may call them opportunities.
Some of us will no doubt take to the streets in protest. There may well be strikes to support various causes. Some of us will feel that we can change things by joining a political party and getting involved. Others will lead press campaigns or write letters. All this is good stuff, but we need to do more.
If Labour represented Broken Britain, the Conservatives represent Smashed-up Britain.
Time to make change!
If you have read this and it rings a bell, maybe a reminder, a call or an alarm then maybe you need to respond.
If you have a child in education or you work in education please get involved with your union, the Governors or Parent Teacher Association. If you’re a tenant join and participate in the tenants association.
At work join your trade union, not just as an insurance policy if you need representation. Get involved, go to meetings, listen and express your views, experiences and fears. We all have issues at work and by sharing them we come together and sort them.
Maybe you have a passion for helping those less fortunate, you don’t have to be a tramp to be homeless, or spendthrift to fall into debt issues. Just losing your job can be enough. If you can help, volunteer.
You might want to consider joining CAMRA, a campaigning organisation devoted to beer or help out at AA. By doing so you make a contribution you make your voice heard and meet like minded people.
You might have questions about Cristianity that you’ve done nothing about. Maybe you just don’t know. Sign up for the Alpha Course at your local church, meet similar people and exchange experiences, hopes and fears.
In the back pages of the Peterborough Evening telegraph there are the local pages. I’m amazed at what goes on in the local areas, useful meetings, consultations, groups being formed to promote various aims. They are an ideal starting place. If you don’t know how to get involved with something you have a passion for then by all means email me. If you do get involved as a result of this blog again please email me.
By making that move, by getting involved, having your say, listening and responding to others we will be bigger than any political party, bigger than any government. Politics doesn’t just happen at Westminster in fact I don’t think it really happens at Westminster it happens here, starting at home, goes to work or college with us, and its with us when we socialise or go online and it’s still with us wherever we lay our head at the end of the day.
We need to take control. Take control and you benefit and so will your community
Sunday, 11 July 2010
Wednesday, 5 May 2010
Most British voters say political parties are corrupt
Most British voters say political parties are corrupt
Submitted by Independent Network on Wed, 05/05/2010 - 08:43
Press Release
Most British voters (51%) say that political parties are corrupt.
Research by ICM, conducted the day after the final leaders’ debate, shows that trust in political parties remains low, even following four weeks of intense campaigning.
The ICM survey also revealed that almost one in three (30%) UK voters wanted their MP to be independent of a political party. This puts the level of support for independents close to that polled for each of the three main parties.
More than one in four (28%) also thought an independent MP would represent them better in parliament. 18 to 24 year old voters were the most likely to agree that political parties are corrupt, as well as the most supportive of independent MPs.
Many voters still can’t see the difference between the political parties at this late stage in the campaign. A new ComRes poll reveals that four in ten voters (38%) are still undecided about who to vote for. The figure was even higher in marginal seats where almost half of respondents (46%) told the final Reuters/Ipsos MORI poll that they are still undecided. Foreign Secretary David Miliband described the number as “unprecedented”. Independent candidates offer the only alternative to political party candidates.
The findings are supported by a survey for Transparency International across 69 countries last year that found political parties were viewed as the most corrupt institutions in society, ahead of the civil service, police, judiciary, parliament, media and private sector. Almost one in three (30%) British respondents selected political parties as the most corrupt institution in society, just ahead of the global average.
Former independent MP, Martin Bell, is looking to increase the number of independents elected by backing the Independent Network, a non-profit organisation that provides support to candidates who are not members of political parties.
“The swing voter is tired of monkeying around,” said Brian Ahearne, Director of the Independent Network. “A vote for the status quo is a wasted vote. The only alternative to political parties is to vote for an independent candidate. As they are not members of a political party, they can represent their constituency more effectively. Independent candidates are guided by considered evidence, their real world experience and expertise, their constituencies and their consciences, not a political party, pressure group or party whip.”
Mr Ahearne continued, “The electorate must not be confused into believing that their vote is for a leader or political party, when in fact on May 6th they will be voting for a local constituency MP.”
- Ends -
Submitted by Independent Network on Wed, 05/05/2010 - 08:43
Press Release
Most British voters (51%) say that political parties are corrupt.
Research by ICM, conducted the day after the final leaders’ debate, shows that trust in political parties remains low, even following four weeks of intense campaigning.
The ICM survey also revealed that almost one in three (30%) UK voters wanted their MP to be independent of a political party. This puts the level of support for independents close to that polled for each of the three main parties.
More than one in four (28%) also thought an independent MP would represent them better in parliament. 18 to 24 year old voters were the most likely to agree that political parties are corrupt, as well as the most supportive of independent MPs.
Many voters still can’t see the difference between the political parties at this late stage in the campaign. A new ComRes poll reveals that four in ten voters (38%) are still undecided about who to vote for. The figure was even higher in marginal seats where almost half of respondents (46%) told the final Reuters/Ipsos MORI poll that they are still undecided. Foreign Secretary David Miliband described the number as “unprecedented”. Independent candidates offer the only alternative to political party candidates.
The findings are supported by a survey for Transparency International across 69 countries last year that found political parties were viewed as the most corrupt institutions in society, ahead of the civil service, police, judiciary, parliament, media and private sector. Almost one in three (30%) British respondents selected political parties as the most corrupt institution in society, just ahead of the global average.
Former independent MP, Martin Bell, is looking to increase the number of independents elected by backing the Independent Network, a non-profit organisation that provides support to candidates who are not members of political parties.
“The swing voter is tired of monkeying around,” said Brian Ahearne, Director of the Independent Network. “A vote for the status quo is a wasted vote. The only alternative to political parties is to vote for an independent candidate. As they are not members of a political party, they can represent their constituency more effectively. Independent candidates are guided by considered evidence, their real world experience and expertise, their constituencies and their consciences, not a political party, pressure group or party whip.”
Mr Ahearne continued, “The electorate must not be confused into believing that their vote is for a leader or political party, when in fact on May 6th they will be voting for a local constituency MP.”
- Ends -
Tuesday, 4 May 2010
5th May 2010 – Nearly There
5th May 2010 – Nearly There
It’s been a really exciting week so far. I am amazed at the amount of support being offered to me at the ballot box. In heady moments, I'm sure it’s a four horse race.
Stewart Jackson obviously looking to build his majority but he is fighting the questions over his expenses from last year. Talking to peopleon the doorstep, they are very sceptical about voting Tory this time, especially as they don't know where the cuts will fall.
Ed Murphy, as the Labour candidate, has to stand on Labour’s 13 year record. There is no appetite for another 5 years of a clapped out Labour government. A vote for Labour is a protest vote because people really fear conservative cuts.
The press locally has covered stories of the interaction between these two. It's just like the old Helen Clark days. Remember her?
Nationally the Liberal Democrats have done well from the Clegg effect, but I haven’t seen this on the doorstep. Traditionally in Peterborough the Liberals finish a wayward third and I think that’s likely this time.
So that leaves the bus-driving Independent, me!
Successfully launching my own manifesto, “Independent Agenda for Peterborough”, producing a business manifesto, “Peterborough Open for Business” and using this blog to comment on events and highlight issues on the agenda for Peterborough have all focussed me on the issues. The response has been terrific.
I have been able to listen to constituents and respond much more positively than the party politicians, because I don't have the dead hand of a political party behind me. The one size fits all approach to problem solving is not for me, because it doesn't work0.
I was really pleased when Martin Bell, the veteran war correspondent and campaigner for clean politics, endorsed my campaign. His recognition that I am promoting honesty and integrity in Politics is important. Recognition has come from many in Peterborough too. Those people offering support and help have inspired and driven me on.
I believe it’s important to vote and I may just be the “none of the above” candidate to you, but I believe I offer much more than just a protest against the three big parties. By voting John Swallow, Independent for Peterborough you are making the most positive choice for all our futures.
I am at the bottom of the ballot paper. To vote Independent you have to pass by all the others on the ballot paper. It is quite fitting really, that the strongest candidate should be holding all the others up!
If you are looking for vision, respect and values in your next MP, you need look no further. You may have to make a leap of faith to vote Independent, but in this election you can send a clear message by voting for John Swallow.
John
It’s been a really exciting week so far. I am amazed at the amount of support being offered to me at the ballot box. In heady moments, I'm sure it’s a four horse race.
Stewart Jackson obviously looking to build his majority but he is fighting the questions over his expenses from last year. Talking to peopleon the doorstep, they are very sceptical about voting Tory this time, especially as they don't know where the cuts will fall.
Ed Murphy, as the Labour candidate, has to stand on Labour’s 13 year record. There is no appetite for another 5 years of a clapped out Labour government. A vote for Labour is a protest vote because people really fear conservative cuts.
The press locally has covered stories of the interaction between these two. It's just like the old Helen Clark days. Remember her?
Nationally the Liberal Democrats have done well from the Clegg effect, but I haven’t seen this on the doorstep. Traditionally in Peterborough the Liberals finish a wayward third and I think that’s likely this time.
So that leaves the bus-driving Independent, me!
Successfully launching my own manifesto, “Independent Agenda for Peterborough”, producing a business manifesto, “Peterborough Open for Business” and using this blog to comment on events and highlight issues on the agenda for Peterborough have all focussed me on the issues. The response has been terrific.
I have been able to listen to constituents and respond much more positively than the party politicians, because I don't have the dead hand of a political party behind me. The one size fits all approach to problem solving is not for me, because it doesn't work0.
I was really pleased when Martin Bell, the veteran war correspondent and campaigner for clean politics, endorsed my campaign. His recognition that I am promoting honesty and integrity in Politics is important. Recognition has come from many in Peterborough too. Those people offering support and help have inspired and driven me on.
I believe it’s important to vote and I may just be the “none of the above” candidate to you, but I believe I offer much more than just a protest against the three big parties. By voting John Swallow, Independent for Peterborough you are making the most positive choice for all our futures.
I am at the bottom of the ballot paper. To vote Independent you have to pass by all the others on the ballot paper. It is quite fitting really, that the strongest candidate should be holding all the others up!
If you are looking for vision, respect and values in your next MP, you need look no further. You may have to make a leap of faith to vote Independent, but in this election you can send a clear message by voting for John Swallow.
John
Sunday, 2 May 2010
2nd May 2010 – Along the Way
2nd May 2010 – Along the Way
It’s been a long time since I was involved with any political campaigning other than the occasional march or work related issue. Probably 1085 was the last time.
Of all the planning, designing, writing, interviews, leafleting, responding to email or telephone the most impacting thing is meeting people. The best way to meet people is on the street campaigning, be it with leafleting or setting up somewhere and just meeting and greeting.
Over the last three weeks I have met so many people and some have really impacted me. They have made me stop, listen and even after I have responded I find myself thinking about it later. Sometimes days afterwards I think about a particular meeting.
I met someone who worked for Hotpoint. Unemployed since he was made redundant along with his wife times are dreadfully hard. They have gone from a joint household income of around £800 per week to being about to lose their home. At their time of life there aren’t the opportunities to take highly paid skilled work, even if it was available. This is why we have to get skilled, well paid work into Peterborough. We cannot thrive, individually or as a community, on a diet of low paid distribution or food production related jobs. I know I want to make that positive impact on their lives.
While leafleting I met someone of my own age. I usually do the briefest of introductions and wait to see if the other person wants to engage. This guy did. I found out that he was a Falklands Island campaign veteran. While I was working in a supermarket this guy was giving everything for his country and the Falkland Islanders. Today he exists unrecognised, health issues unresolved, struggling on a daily basis. He feels that society has passed him and his comrades by. Even those who leave our armed forces today do not receive the care that they deserve. As part of their concerns they have formed an ex-serviceman’s group in Peterborough. He was keen that I get involved and come and meet them. It will be my absolute pleasure to meet them and elected or not, take up their cause and cases.
I had a phone message left on the answer phone this week. I often get those and it’s a great way of getting straight to the point. Finding out by message what the issue is and then conversing to better understand and show a way forward. This young lady has a disability and I was put on the spot about how I would respond to her needs and benefit her life. I believe I was able to understand her points and offer positive solutions. During the conversation it was becoming clear to me that this young person was able to communicate capably and speak passionately. The conversation moved on. I have invited her to contact me again after the election so we can discuss things more fully and I can give her my total support to stand as an Independent Candidate for the city council. Quite simply, she would be brilliant and shake up lots of things on the City Council.
I also met Di Newman who is standing as an Independent candidate in Central ward. Di read my Election Communication as delivered by the Royal Mail and got in touch. I’m really hoping we both get elected as Di is someone who is despite physical constraints is really motivated I would love to work with her. She gets around on a mobility scooter that has “tardis” like qualities for carrying everything with her that she needs for campaigning and supporting her huge commitment to voluntary work. Di has her work cut out in Central Ward but if it was down to effort, integrity and having the community at heart she would storm it! Di is totally involved in housing and homeless issues, disabled and older people concerns and is taking on the worries of the market Traders at Peterborough Market. Working with Di is inspirational stuff! Please support her in central ward.
In Werrington I found a couple, both in their mid seventies were cutting down branches from a tree next to their home. They were struggling to do this between them to stop the young people pulling the branches of blossom off and creating mischief. Both with mobility issues the council had refused them a dedicated parking space outside their home in the communal parking area. This was wrong but I was to find out worse. Their son lives with them and I met him briefly. Now in his thirties, he once ran a successful business but had had to deal with mental health issues. I could see his return to work was some time away, even given the proper support. Unbelievably he has been assessed as fit for work and told to find employment. His benefits will be cut and he will have no income. It is wrong that we have a dependency culture in this country where welfare is seen as a desirable alternative to work and a whole network of people use and abuse the safety net of the state. Others fall through the net just like this man. I cannot describe the love of these two elderly parents, who should be enjoying their retirement in peace and security, who said, “We will look after him somehow, he is our son.” This wonderful couple have only a basic state pension to do this. At no time when we talked about anti social behaviour, pensions, parking needs, health and society in general did they show any bitterness or anger just a reflective sadness. I have already been able to talk to the excellent Independent local councillors, John and Judy Fox who will take up their case. Elected or not I will also call again to see what needs to be done.
Being elected MP for Peterborough isn’t about disappearing off down to London for five years and popping back with updates. It isn’t about photo opportunities in the local press and back slapping dinner parties. It isn’t about claiming and making money out of your electors. It isn’t even about just representing those people who voted for you.
It is about serving everyone without exclusion. It is about changing society, improving community living , supporting families, however they are made up, and you do it because you belong to the community you serve. This is my community and I want to serve it, all of it and I want to serve you.
I have met lots of other people, but I want you to read this, not endure it! I hope it is as thought provoking for you as it is for me. I believe what I have written is a reflection of some of the problems in Peterborough. Another time I would really enjoy writing about the successes of lives in Peterborough. Maybe as your Independent MP I could be part of turning the problems into successes; it’s your choice on May 6th
It’s been a long time since I was involved with any political campaigning other than the occasional march or work related issue. Probably 1085 was the last time.
Of all the planning, designing, writing, interviews, leafleting, responding to email or telephone the most impacting thing is meeting people. The best way to meet people is on the street campaigning, be it with leafleting or setting up somewhere and just meeting and greeting.
Over the last three weeks I have met so many people and some have really impacted me. They have made me stop, listen and even after I have responded I find myself thinking about it later. Sometimes days afterwards I think about a particular meeting.
I met someone who worked for Hotpoint. Unemployed since he was made redundant along with his wife times are dreadfully hard. They have gone from a joint household income of around £800 per week to being about to lose their home. At their time of life there aren’t the opportunities to take highly paid skilled work, even if it was available. This is why we have to get skilled, well paid work into Peterborough. We cannot thrive, individually or as a community, on a diet of low paid distribution or food production related jobs. I know I want to make that positive impact on their lives.
While leafleting I met someone of my own age. I usually do the briefest of introductions and wait to see if the other person wants to engage. This guy did. I found out that he was a Falklands Island campaign veteran. While I was working in a supermarket this guy was giving everything for his country and the Falkland Islanders. Today he exists unrecognised, health issues unresolved, struggling on a daily basis. He feels that society has passed him and his comrades by. Even those who leave our armed forces today do not receive the care that they deserve. As part of their concerns they have formed an ex-serviceman’s group in Peterborough. He was keen that I get involved and come and meet them. It will be my absolute pleasure to meet them and elected or not, take up their cause and cases.
I had a phone message left on the answer phone this week. I often get those and it’s a great way of getting straight to the point. Finding out by message what the issue is and then conversing to better understand and show a way forward. This young lady has a disability and I was put on the spot about how I would respond to her needs and benefit her life. I believe I was able to understand her points and offer positive solutions. During the conversation it was becoming clear to me that this young person was able to communicate capably and speak passionately. The conversation moved on. I have invited her to contact me again after the election so we can discuss things more fully and I can give her my total support to stand as an Independent Candidate for the city council. Quite simply, she would be brilliant and shake up lots of things on the City Council.
I also met Di Newman who is standing as an Independent candidate in Central ward. Di read my Election Communication as delivered by the Royal Mail and got in touch. I’m really hoping we both get elected as Di is someone who is despite physical constraints is really motivated I would love to work with her. She gets around on a mobility scooter that has “tardis” like qualities for carrying everything with her that she needs for campaigning and supporting her huge commitment to voluntary work. Di has her work cut out in Central Ward but if it was down to effort, integrity and having the community at heart she would storm it! Di is totally involved in housing and homeless issues, disabled and older people concerns and is taking on the worries of the market Traders at Peterborough Market. Working with Di is inspirational stuff! Please support her in central ward.
In Werrington I found a couple, both in their mid seventies were cutting down branches from a tree next to their home. They were struggling to do this between them to stop the young people pulling the branches of blossom off and creating mischief. Both with mobility issues the council had refused them a dedicated parking space outside their home in the communal parking area. This was wrong but I was to find out worse. Their son lives with them and I met him briefly. Now in his thirties, he once ran a successful business but had had to deal with mental health issues. I could see his return to work was some time away, even given the proper support. Unbelievably he has been assessed as fit for work and told to find employment. His benefits will be cut and he will have no income. It is wrong that we have a dependency culture in this country where welfare is seen as a desirable alternative to work and a whole network of people use and abuse the safety net of the state. Others fall through the net just like this man. I cannot describe the love of these two elderly parents, who should be enjoying their retirement in peace and security, who said, “We will look after him somehow, he is our son.” This wonderful couple have only a basic state pension to do this. At no time when we talked about anti social behaviour, pensions, parking needs, health and society in general did they show any bitterness or anger just a reflective sadness. I have already been able to talk to the excellent Independent local councillors, John and Judy Fox who will take up their case. Elected or not I will also call again to see what needs to be done.
Being elected MP for Peterborough isn’t about disappearing off down to London for five years and popping back with updates. It isn’t about photo opportunities in the local press and back slapping dinner parties. It isn’t about claiming and making money out of your electors. It isn’t even about just representing those people who voted for you.
It is about serving everyone without exclusion. It is about changing society, improving community living , supporting families, however they are made up, and you do it because you belong to the community you serve. This is my community and I want to serve it, all of it and I want to serve you.
I have met lots of other people, but I want you to read this, not endure it! I hope it is as thought provoking for you as it is for me. I believe what I have written is a reflection of some of the problems in Peterborough. Another time I would really enjoy writing about the successes of lives in Peterborough. Maybe as your Independent MP I could be part of turning the problems into successes; it’s your choice on May 6th
Thursday, 29 April 2010
PETERBOROUGH OPEN FOR BUSINESS - The business manifesto
Peterborough - Open for Business
Business is good for Peterborough and Peterborough is good for business. The city’s fantastic transport links to London and other population centres, its long history of skilled manufacturing and untapped room for expansion make Peterborough an ideal place for new and established businesses. As MP it would be my job to promote Peterborough’s advantages, as well as continue to encourage measures to make the city and region even more attractive to business.
Peterborough has seen the decline of its manufacturing base over many governments. Only by having a substantial private sector creating wealth will it be possible to deliver the aspirations of all of us who live in Peterborough. It is essential to attract companies with the best, highly paid, skilled jobs to Peterborough. To prepare the city for attracting a big employer, small business in Peterborough needs every help it can get. Successful small and medium sized businesses create the right environment for our city to thrive. Significant obstacles are in the way of this.
As Peterborough’s MP I see my role in developing business opportunities, protecting workers and employers and being part of a team that creates an enterprise “effect” in our city.
No win, no fee claims cost business many millions of pounds every year. I believe that there must be a cheaper, quicker way to deal with compensation claims. The widespread compensation culture is wrong. I would support a full review of how we deal with compensation claims. There should be a broad range of defined amounts of compensation that would apply generally to a range of complaints. Access to compensation claims should be simple and cheap as it is with claims at County Court for smaller claims and the Industrial Tribunal Service.
Business energy users should be encouraged to bulk buy energy, giving them the opportunity to save money on their annual energy costs. Business should support the green energy revolution to make it even more viable. Our increasing use of green energy sources is a great opportunity for Peterborough to get involved in research, development and manufacture in a growing sector of the market.
Employers that interface with children and young people often find the cost of Criminal Records Bureaux checks and Protection of Vulnerable Adults checks are time consuming and expensive. Some employers, often in the care industry, make excessive charges to potential employees to apply for clearance. I believe a card based system which the individual pays for and holds would be better. The employer can then subscribe to a checking service, which would be a quicker and cheaper system. Individuals would be more aware of what checks reveal about them and would be able to take account of the potential impact on their status should they be convicted of a crime.
Revenue and Customs (HMRC) often take heavy handed action in winding up small and medium sized businesses that are, for various reasons, late payers of tax. Where the underlying business is sound but there is an outside factor, (i.e. bankruptcy of a customer) HMRC should be more sympathetic, providing the risk to the taxpayer does not increase. A mechanism should be in place to stop HMRC winding up companies that are basically sound going concerns. Companies which evade or refuse to pay their taxes must be wound up. This could be done with no risk of further losses to the tax payer, indeed the taxpayer would gain
Within sensible limits small business should be able to take advantage of protection against winding up where the business is sound but finance is withdrawn by a bank or finance house. Historically banks have been very narrow minded in supporting business. The recession was caused by the collapse of the banking system. It is a strange irony that the banks, rescued by billions of taxpayers’ money can only spare “buttons” for business. Many businesses have experienced arbitrary cuts in overdrafts and credit facilities. It may be a solution that an independent arbiter would review any foreclosure resulting in a company closure.
British banks have notoriously little sympathy with struggling businesses. Banks are often far too cautious and prefer short term gain in place of long term growth and this harms the British economy. If existing banks are not prepared to take the long term view, as happens already in many countries, then new entrants to the banking sector must be encouraged. An industry based co-operative model may be an ideal solution.
Businesses pay business rates. Often these are an expensive local tax with little direct benefit to the payer. Businesses should have representation at a local level. This would mean that they elect a small number of councillors who would have limited powers but would be able to make the case for business in local councils. There are a variety of ways that this could and should be done.
The way local councils spend their funds directly impacts on the business community. Councils should be regulated in such a way that they support competitive local businesses. This is not designed to undermine competition rules. For example, local newspapers provide a depth of communication and a valuable paid-for service to the communities they supply but the local public sector communications budget is often spent on bespoke expensive, glossy and exclusive publications. Not only do these give the impression of local public sector waste but they undermine the local press. By using the local press for editorial copy as well as advertising local public service providers can support and add to the quality of the local press.
Councils should identify unoccupied business premises with a view to ensuring they are available to market to potential customers. Where there is a shortage of suitable small industrial premises, ideal for start-up businesses, councils should provide basic easy-in, easy-out premises. These should be made readily available to first-timers and young entrepreneurs to encourage an enterprise culture.
Young people should be supported in new business ventures. Young people are often gifted in new technologies but have undeveloped business experience. Education should respond to this need. Government should provide grants in lieu of other payments, i.e. job seekers allowance. Councils should be able to provide premises to viable, well presented business propositions.
If the banks are unwilling to provide the funding essential to the running of sound businesses the government should encourage a new type of commercial bank. This could be a co-operative bank relative to the industry sector so it builds an expertise in understanding its customers and the challenges they face.
Where companies use the most environmentally friendly vehicles , excise tax rates should reflect the reduced impact on the environment.
While free trade is essential fair trade is also essential. Through the European Union Government should lead efforts to protect our industry and companies against unfair competition.
Abuse of smaller suppliers by very large customers is not fair. Several enquiries into supermarkets for example have uncovered evidence of unfair trading practices. Progress in this area has been too slow resulting in some smaller businesses ceasing trading. Often small businesses experience intimidation by larger customers which frustrates investigation. It should be for the customer to prove that they are fair in their dealings. Unwritten contracts are simply not acceptable as often offered by large customers like the supermarkets. The Office of Fair Trading should have enhanced powers to investigate unfair trade and deal severely with substantiated complaints.
Foreign takeovers of British companies in the global economy often result in job losses. Government should protect jobs and business in this country by taking decisions on an individual basis as to whether foreign ownership is problematic for British Interests.
Penalties for evading paying the national minimum wage, taxes, national insurance and business rates should be increased dramatically. Businesses that do not abide by the rules threaten the existence of properly run businesses that play their full part in the community.
Peterborough’s MP should be a leading figure in attracting investment into the city. The effort required is well worth the prize. A major manufacturer coming to Peterborough has to be the goal of the MP. This will provide well paid jobs, encourage local suppliers and in turn attract other major employers. The local economy would benefit and the tax revenue would enable high quality local services.
As Peterborough’s MP I will make myself open for business. I will always be willing to meet to members of the business community to improve my understanding of the issues so that I can make Peterborough’s case at Westminster. There will also be regular meetings at which I can be challenged on what is happening in government.
John Swallow
85 Donaldson Drive
Peterborough
PE4 7XJ
www.johnswallow.org.uk
07879 468468
Published and printed by John Brooks, Agent for John Swallow. 85 Donaldson Drive Peterborough PE4 7XJ
Business is good for Peterborough and Peterborough is good for business. The city’s fantastic transport links to London and other population centres, its long history of skilled manufacturing and untapped room for expansion make Peterborough an ideal place for new and established businesses. As MP it would be my job to promote Peterborough’s advantages, as well as continue to encourage measures to make the city and region even more attractive to business.
Peterborough has seen the decline of its manufacturing base over many governments. Only by having a substantial private sector creating wealth will it be possible to deliver the aspirations of all of us who live in Peterborough. It is essential to attract companies with the best, highly paid, skilled jobs to Peterborough. To prepare the city for attracting a big employer, small business in Peterborough needs every help it can get. Successful small and medium sized businesses create the right environment for our city to thrive. Significant obstacles are in the way of this.
As Peterborough’s MP I see my role in developing business opportunities, protecting workers and employers and being part of a team that creates an enterprise “effect” in our city.
No win, no fee claims cost business many millions of pounds every year. I believe that there must be a cheaper, quicker way to deal with compensation claims. The widespread compensation culture is wrong. I would support a full review of how we deal with compensation claims. There should be a broad range of defined amounts of compensation that would apply generally to a range of complaints. Access to compensation claims should be simple and cheap as it is with claims at County Court for smaller claims and the Industrial Tribunal Service.
Business energy users should be encouraged to bulk buy energy, giving them the opportunity to save money on their annual energy costs. Business should support the green energy revolution to make it even more viable. Our increasing use of green energy sources is a great opportunity for Peterborough to get involved in research, development and manufacture in a growing sector of the market.
Employers that interface with children and young people often find the cost of Criminal Records Bureaux checks and Protection of Vulnerable Adults checks are time consuming and expensive. Some employers, often in the care industry, make excessive charges to potential employees to apply for clearance. I believe a card based system which the individual pays for and holds would be better. The employer can then subscribe to a checking service, which would be a quicker and cheaper system. Individuals would be more aware of what checks reveal about them and would be able to take account of the potential impact on their status should they be convicted of a crime.
Revenue and Customs (HMRC) often take heavy handed action in winding up small and medium sized businesses that are, for various reasons, late payers of tax. Where the underlying business is sound but there is an outside factor, (i.e. bankruptcy of a customer) HMRC should be more sympathetic, providing the risk to the taxpayer does not increase. A mechanism should be in place to stop HMRC winding up companies that are basically sound going concerns. Companies which evade or refuse to pay their taxes must be wound up. This could be done with no risk of further losses to the tax payer, indeed the taxpayer would gain
Within sensible limits small business should be able to take advantage of protection against winding up where the business is sound but finance is withdrawn by a bank or finance house. Historically banks have been very narrow minded in supporting business. The recession was caused by the collapse of the banking system. It is a strange irony that the banks, rescued by billions of taxpayers’ money can only spare “buttons” for business. Many businesses have experienced arbitrary cuts in overdrafts and credit facilities. It may be a solution that an independent arbiter would review any foreclosure resulting in a company closure.
British banks have notoriously little sympathy with struggling businesses. Banks are often far too cautious and prefer short term gain in place of long term growth and this harms the British economy. If existing banks are not prepared to take the long term view, as happens already in many countries, then new entrants to the banking sector must be encouraged. An industry based co-operative model may be an ideal solution.
Businesses pay business rates. Often these are an expensive local tax with little direct benefit to the payer. Businesses should have representation at a local level. This would mean that they elect a small number of councillors who would have limited powers but would be able to make the case for business in local councils. There are a variety of ways that this could and should be done.
The way local councils spend their funds directly impacts on the business community. Councils should be regulated in such a way that they support competitive local businesses. This is not designed to undermine competition rules. For example, local newspapers provide a depth of communication and a valuable paid-for service to the communities they supply but the local public sector communications budget is often spent on bespoke expensive, glossy and exclusive publications. Not only do these give the impression of local public sector waste but they undermine the local press. By using the local press for editorial copy as well as advertising local public service providers can support and add to the quality of the local press.
Councils should identify unoccupied business premises with a view to ensuring they are available to market to potential customers. Where there is a shortage of suitable small industrial premises, ideal for start-up businesses, councils should provide basic easy-in, easy-out premises. These should be made readily available to first-timers and young entrepreneurs to encourage an enterprise culture.
Young people should be supported in new business ventures. Young people are often gifted in new technologies but have undeveloped business experience. Education should respond to this need. Government should provide grants in lieu of other payments, i.e. job seekers allowance. Councils should be able to provide premises to viable, well presented business propositions.
If the banks are unwilling to provide the funding essential to the running of sound businesses the government should encourage a new type of commercial bank. This could be a co-operative bank relative to the industry sector so it builds an expertise in understanding its customers and the challenges they face.
Where companies use the most environmentally friendly vehicles , excise tax rates should reflect the reduced impact on the environment.
While free trade is essential fair trade is also essential. Through the European Union Government should lead efforts to protect our industry and companies against unfair competition.
Abuse of smaller suppliers by very large customers is not fair. Several enquiries into supermarkets for example have uncovered evidence of unfair trading practices. Progress in this area has been too slow resulting in some smaller businesses ceasing trading. Often small businesses experience intimidation by larger customers which frustrates investigation. It should be for the customer to prove that they are fair in their dealings. Unwritten contracts are simply not acceptable as often offered by large customers like the supermarkets. The Office of Fair Trading should have enhanced powers to investigate unfair trade and deal severely with substantiated complaints.
Foreign takeovers of British companies in the global economy often result in job losses. Government should protect jobs and business in this country by taking decisions on an individual basis as to whether foreign ownership is problematic for British Interests.
Penalties for evading paying the national minimum wage, taxes, national insurance and business rates should be increased dramatically. Businesses that do not abide by the rules threaten the existence of properly run businesses that play their full part in the community.
Peterborough’s MP should be a leading figure in attracting investment into the city. The effort required is well worth the prize. A major manufacturer coming to Peterborough has to be the goal of the MP. This will provide well paid jobs, encourage local suppliers and in turn attract other major employers. The local economy would benefit and the tax revenue would enable high quality local services.
As Peterborough’s MP I will make myself open for business. I will always be willing to meet to members of the business community to improve my understanding of the issues so that I can make Peterborough’s case at Westminster. There will also be regular meetings at which I can be challenged on what is happening in government.
John Swallow
85 Donaldson Drive
Peterborough
PE4 7XJ
www.johnswallow.org.uk
07879 468468
Published and printed by John Brooks, Agent for John Swallow. 85 Donaldson Drive Peterborough PE4 7XJ
Wednesday, 28 April 2010
28th April 2010 – A Celebration of Diversity
28th April 2010 – A Celebration of Diversity
This week I have met all the candidates that I’m standing against in this Election. Collectively, we are a very mixed bunch. I have now seen wide range of diverse views and the characters that are delivering them.
I had written an email to Francis Fox from UKIP a couple of weeks ago. I was concerned at the BBC’s obsession with covering the big three parties. Francis’ reply was quick and contained positive ideas on how we might be able to improve BBC coverage. Having been barred from the BBC East Politics Show debate myself I watched it like many (millions, thousands or hundreds I’m not so sure) and I first saw Francis on the telly. The feedback from others was that it was so shambolic it was better to have been barred than be present. The general comment was made that it made Peterborough look ridiculous.
Other media providers said the show coughed into some sort of action as Francis tackled the issue of the veil. Francis did indeed tackle the issue of the veil and the Burka. A friend of hers had very nearly been run down by someone wearing a Burka and of course you don’t know who could be behind the Burka. The point was made that it could be a man.
Having occasionally been involved in television interviews and programmes over the years the whole BBC show thing looked suspicious to me. I felt that Francis was being set up for ridicule by the BBC and the whole spectacle was unedifying.
I then met Francis in person at the PCS Union hustings debate the next evening. Francis is 77 and at a time when most 77 year olds are contemplating how good ten or more years of retirement have been, Francis has thrown herself into a political campaign. There are times I could quite easily give her a hug, just as you would a senior family member. You’re not sure why you do it, you just do it. I can’t say we agree on policy at all but I respect her courage and tenacity at making her point. Francis takes exception to my belief that UKIP is the beating heart of the Tory Party and I’m sure we will discuss that again. The campaign needs a Francis Fox.
Ed Murphy makes his points by engaging directly, he says it as he sees it. If Ed was the Labour Party, I don’t think this election would have the dynamics it currently does. The guy is straight. So straight that I wonder what policies Ed shares with Labour. Ed’s problem is that he has to represent a Party that has been in office for 13 years and the public want change. Not only did New Labour wipe out principles that had stood for decades, it cleared out the Labour Party membership. The destruction of the grass roots membership, the leafleters, doorknockers the Election Day tea-makers pretty much all gone. Heaven forbid in New Labour that a membership would want to shape policy, have democracy within the party and hold the leadership accountable. For me the other indictment is the amount of Labour MPs that trousered cash: They have absolutely no shame.
Sitting to my left on Monday’s debate was Fiona Radic from the Green Party. The debate was quite heated at times but Fiona remained calmly in control. When she wasn’t speaking, she was listening, taking notes and checking facts from her manifesto. When she did speak it was with knowledge and clarity. She was probably the quietest of the speakers on Monday night; however, the audience then quietened and listened to good points well made. The Greens are making the journey from single issue politics in a steady way. If Fiona’s presentation of the Green Party policy is the party standard, then I believe all Parties will end up being benchmarked by those standards. Their support will grow as policy development continues; maybe they’ll be the next force in politics?
Nick Sandford from the Liberal Democrats probably has the highest profile locally. I have only met Nick once. I’m sure the vast majority of people in Peterborough know Nick Sandford much better than I do, so I will keep listening and learning. But Nick, from my observations, gives very full answers, very, very full answers, probably the fullest answers of all of us.
I met Rob King from the English Democrats at BBC Radio Cambridgeshire on Monday. Rob wasn’t quite what I was prepared for. The English Democrats (EDP) have candidates like Steve Uncles, standing in Gravesham. If you google Mr Uncles the results are really very interesting. Similarly Mark Cotterill and Peter Ruston are leading lights in the English Democrats, all worthy of a quick google search. (While you’re googling, google me too please!) Rob didn’t seem at all like those chaps, he was altogether different. Maybe it’s just the party he keeps.
I would love to comment on Stewart Jackson but after hearing him threaten to sue one of the audience on Monday night at a hustings debate (covered by the Peterborough Evening Telegraph 28th April 2010)) and again hearing him making threatening legal noises at Ed Murphy at Kings School Q and A on Tuesday, I’m keeping quiet, for once. Stewart’s twitter page makes reference to his legal interest.
Conservatives have a long history of suing people who worry them. From Lord Boothby in the 1960s, Jonathon Aitken and Jeffrey Archer in the 1990s and just this March 2010, Lord Ashcroft likes British Courts for suing, (Independent Newspaper) and of course Theresa Gorman (remember her?) liked a dabble in libel law too.
As far as my own performance goes I would be happy for feedback from anyone. Comment is free, I might respond but I won’t sue!
I am enjoying the campaign and the momentum as it builds. With just over a week to go I think the campaign is getting very interesting. Immigration has quietened even if it hasn’t been resolved leaving the arena more open to other subjects. I am convinced that standards in public life will be a hot topic of the coming week. The focus will fall away from the big three national leaders to the fact that Peterborough people are electing their representative in parliament. They know that a party politician will always put their party first, a government minister will always put the government first and they know only an Independent will put them first.
Diversity rules!
This week I have met all the candidates that I’m standing against in this Election. Collectively, we are a very mixed bunch. I have now seen wide range of diverse views and the characters that are delivering them.
I had written an email to Francis Fox from UKIP a couple of weeks ago. I was concerned at the BBC’s obsession with covering the big three parties. Francis’ reply was quick and contained positive ideas on how we might be able to improve BBC coverage. Having been barred from the BBC East Politics Show debate myself I watched it like many (millions, thousands or hundreds I’m not so sure) and I first saw Francis on the telly. The feedback from others was that it was so shambolic it was better to have been barred than be present. The general comment was made that it made Peterborough look ridiculous.
Other media providers said the show coughed into some sort of action as Francis tackled the issue of the veil. Francis did indeed tackle the issue of the veil and the Burka. A friend of hers had very nearly been run down by someone wearing a Burka and of course you don’t know who could be behind the Burka. The point was made that it could be a man.
Having occasionally been involved in television interviews and programmes over the years the whole BBC show thing looked suspicious to me. I felt that Francis was being set up for ridicule by the BBC and the whole spectacle was unedifying.
I then met Francis in person at the PCS Union hustings debate the next evening. Francis is 77 and at a time when most 77 year olds are contemplating how good ten or more years of retirement have been, Francis has thrown herself into a political campaign. There are times I could quite easily give her a hug, just as you would a senior family member. You’re not sure why you do it, you just do it. I can’t say we agree on policy at all but I respect her courage and tenacity at making her point. Francis takes exception to my belief that UKIP is the beating heart of the Tory Party and I’m sure we will discuss that again. The campaign needs a Francis Fox.
Ed Murphy makes his points by engaging directly, he says it as he sees it. If Ed was the Labour Party, I don’t think this election would have the dynamics it currently does. The guy is straight. So straight that I wonder what policies Ed shares with Labour. Ed’s problem is that he has to represent a Party that has been in office for 13 years and the public want change. Not only did New Labour wipe out principles that had stood for decades, it cleared out the Labour Party membership. The destruction of the grass roots membership, the leafleters, doorknockers the Election Day tea-makers pretty much all gone. Heaven forbid in New Labour that a membership would want to shape policy, have democracy within the party and hold the leadership accountable. For me the other indictment is the amount of Labour MPs that trousered cash: They have absolutely no shame.
Sitting to my left on Monday’s debate was Fiona Radic from the Green Party. The debate was quite heated at times but Fiona remained calmly in control. When she wasn’t speaking, she was listening, taking notes and checking facts from her manifesto. When she did speak it was with knowledge and clarity. She was probably the quietest of the speakers on Monday night; however, the audience then quietened and listened to good points well made. The Greens are making the journey from single issue politics in a steady way. If Fiona’s presentation of the Green Party policy is the party standard, then I believe all Parties will end up being benchmarked by those standards. Their support will grow as policy development continues; maybe they’ll be the next force in politics?
Nick Sandford from the Liberal Democrats probably has the highest profile locally. I have only met Nick once. I’m sure the vast majority of people in Peterborough know Nick Sandford much better than I do, so I will keep listening and learning. But Nick, from my observations, gives very full answers, very, very full answers, probably the fullest answers of all of us.
I met Rob King from the English Democrats at BBC Radio Cambridgeshire on Monday. Rob wasn’t quite what I was prepared for. The English Democrats (EDP) have candidates like Steve Uncles, standing in Gravesham. If you google Mr Uncles the results are really very interesting. Similarly Mark Cotterill and Peter Ruston are leading lights in the English Democrats, all worthy of a quick google search. (While you’re googling, google me too please!) Rob didn’t seem at all like those chaps, he was altogether different. Maybe it’s just the party he keeps.
I would love to comment on Stewart Jackson but after hearing him threaten to sue one of the audience on Monday night at a hustings debate (covered by the Peterborough Evening Telegraph 28th April 2010)) and again hearing him making threatening legal noises at Ed Murphy at Kings School Q and A on Tuesday, I’m keeping quiet, for once. Stewart’s twitter page makes reference to his legal interest.
Conservatives have a long history of suing people who worry them. From Lord Boothby in the 1960s, Jonathon Aitken and Jeffrey Archer in the 1990s and just this March 2010, Lord Ashcroft likes British Courts for suing, (Independent Newspaper) and of course Theresa Gorman (remember her?) liked a dabble in libel law too.
As far as my own performance goes I would be happy for feedback from anyone. Comment is free, I might respond but I won’t sue!
I am enjoying the campaign and the momentum as it builds. With just over a week to go I think the campaign is getting very interesting. Immigration has quietened even if it hasn’t been resolved leaving the arena more open to other subjects. I am convinced that standards in public life will be a hot topic of the coming week. The focus will fall away from the big three national leaders to the fact that Peterborough people are electing their representative in parliament. They know that a party politician will always put their party first, a government minister will always put the government first and they know only an Independent will put them first.
Diversity rules!
Sunday, 25 April 2010
25th April 2010 – Instant Messenger- johnswallow2010@live.co.uk
25th April 2010 – Instant Messenger- johnswallow2010@live.co.uk
I’m often on the computer early and late doing bits and pieces, in fact at any time. When I’m online I will be putting “Windows Live Messenger” on. Time permitting, I can then answer questions and even hold mini debates using the group chat facility. Please do add me (johnswallow2010@live.co.uk) on whatever Instant Messenger program you’re using, i.e. Yahoo. I will be interested to see how this works.
I’m often on the computer early and late doing bits and pieces, in fact at any time. When I’m online I will be putting “Windows Live Messenger” on. Time permitting, I can then answer questions and even hold mini debates using the group chat facility. Please do add me (johnswallow2010@live.co.uk) on whatever Instant Messenger program you’re using, i.e. Yahoo. I will be interested to see how this works.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
